Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Federated Hermes, Inc.
How Federated Hermes, Inc. stacks up
FHI · against 268 other Financial Services companies
Valuation
69/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #83 of 269 · scores higher than 69% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score27 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including FHI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 69?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 8.2% vs peer median 6.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 66% of peers. Earnings yield: 9.2% vs peer median 5.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 78% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.2% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FHI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FHI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 410 reported | 8.6% | 5.6% | 66% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 206 reported | 12.2% | 6.8% | 78% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 183 reported | 6.6% | 6.1% | 53% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 401 reported | 28.2% | 83.1% | 21% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FHI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 82M USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 78 | 49.8B USD | 71 | 55 | |
| 81 | 18.7B EUR (≈$20.6B) | 70 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score