Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Federated Hermes, Inc.
How Federated Hermes, Inc. stacks up
FHI · against 54 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Valuation
69/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #16 of 55 · scores higher than 72% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score4 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including FHI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 69?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 8.2% vs peer median 6.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 66% of peers. Earnings yield: 9.2% vs peer median 5.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 78% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.2% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FHI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FHI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 77 reported | 8.6% | 5.5% | 68% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 45 reported | 12.2% | 5.7% | 84% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 37 reported | 6.6% | 6.5% | 53% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 77 reported | 28.2% | 51.9% | 24% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FHI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.2B BRL (≈$3.8B) | 96 | 66 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 96 | 66 | |
| 3 | 3.2B USD | 94 | 66 | |
| 3 | 6.5B USD | 94 | 48 | |
| 5 | 5.3B GBP (≈$6.9B) | 92 | 79 | |
| 12 | 2.7B USD | 73 | 63 | |
| 12 | 3.3B USD | 73 | 57 | |
| 14 | 183.3B TWD (≈$5.7B) | 72 | 29 | |
| 15 | 403.2B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 71 | 67 | |
| 16 | 4.6B USD | 69 | 70 | |
| 17 | 90.1B THB (≈$2.5B) | 65 | 57 | |
| 18 | 3.1B USD | 62 | 63 | |
| 19 | 3.8B GBP (≈$4.9B) | 61 | 55 | |
| 20 | 7.1B USD | 59 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score