Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ferguson Enterprises Inc.
How Ferguson Enterprises Inc. stacks up
FERG · against 114 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #73 of 115 · scores higher than 36% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score17 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including FERG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.5% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.7% vs peer median 4.4%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 9.3% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FERG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FERG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 115 reported | 4.7% | 6.8% | 36% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 105 reported | 9.3% | 7.5% | 56% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 114 reported | 2.5% | 6.3% | 31% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FERG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 2 | 90.8B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 63.3B CAD (≈$46.2B) | 95 | 56 | |
| 3 | 51.7B USD | 95 | 58 | |
| 3 | 34.8B USD | 95 | 49 | |
| 68 | 247.0B HKD (≈$31.6B) | 49 | 43 | |
| 68 | 60.0B EUR (≈$66.0B) | 49 | 54 | |
| 71 | 5.22T JPY (≈$35.5B) | 48 | 59 | |
| 71 | 75.3B USD | 48 | 39 | |
| 73 | 46.8B USD | 47 | 52 | |
| 73 | 74.4B USD | 47 | 47 | |
| 75 | 436.1B SEK (≈$43.6B) | 46 | 50 | |
| 75 | 29.2B USD | 46 | 50 | |
| 77 | 26.6B USD | 45 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score