Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ferrovial N.V.
How Ferrovial N.V. stacks up
FER · against 121 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
27/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #112 of 122 · scores higher than 7% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score7 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including FER · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 27?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 98% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -86.3% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.2% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 68% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 8.4% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FER, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FER | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 123 reported | 5.2% | 6.8% | 39% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 109 reported | -86.3% | 9.0% | 0% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 121 reported | 8.4% | 6.3% | 65% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FER| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 2 | 22.7B USD | 96 | 41 | |
| 3 | 63.3B CAD (≈$46.2B) | 95 | 56 | |
| 3 | 51.7B USD | 95 | 58 | |
| 3 | 34.8B USD | 95 | 49 | |
| 108 | 37.0B USD | 30 | 54 | |
| 109 | 76.6B USD | 29 | 42 | |
| 109 | 34.3B EUR (≈$37.8B) | 29 | 49 | |
| 111 | 28.8B USD | 28 | 48 | |
| 112 | 41.4B USD | 27 | 27 | |
| 112 | 37.1B EUR (≈$40.9B) | 27 | 30 | |
| 114 | 259.3B HKD (≈$33.2B) | 25 | 53 | |
| 115 | 45.6B USD | 20 | 29 | |
| 116 | 627.9B SEK (≈$62.8B) | 18 | 38 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score