Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to FTI Consulting, Inc.
How FTI Consulting, Inc. stacks up
FCN · against 447 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
55/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #217 of 448 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score70 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including FCN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 55?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.0% vs peer median 6.9%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.7% vs peer median 3.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 72% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 6.7% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FCN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FCN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 440 reported | 4.3% | 4.3% | 49% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 452 reported | 6.9% | 7.8% | 41% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 197 reported | 6.7% | 4.1% | 74% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 440 reported | 25.4% | 40.3% | 27% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FCN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 4 | 22.0B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 4 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 217 | 640.6B JPY (≈$4.4B) | 55 | 48 | |
| 217 | 1.06T JPY (≈$7.2B) | 55 | 76 | |
| 217 | 4.5B EUR (≈$4.9B) | 55 | 40 | |
| 217 | 4.7B EUR (≈$5.1B) | 55 | 60 | |
| 217 | 5.3B USD | 55 | 60 | |
| 217 | 103.1B TRY (≈$3.1B) | 55 | 46 | |
| 217 | 10.3B USD | 55 | 57 | |
| 224 | 19.5B CNY (≈$2.7B) | 54 | 51 | |
| 224 | 7.3B USD | 54 | 72 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score