Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
How FirstCash Holdings, Inc. stacks up
FCFS · against 49 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Valuation
45/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #25 of 50 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score9 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including FCFS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.6% vs peer median 5.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.2% vs peer median 6.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.3% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FCFS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FCFS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 69 reported | 4.5% | 5.3% | 43% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 44 reported | 7.2% | 7.7% | 47% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 34 reported | 6.5% | 6.6% | 48% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 70 reported | 27.5% | 40.1% | 20% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FCFS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.5B USD | 94 | 48 | |
| 2 | 5.3B GBP (≈$6.9B) | 92 | 79 | |
| 3 | 9.2B GBP (≈$11.9B) | 86 | 58 | |
| 4 | 5.2B USD | 85 | 45 | |
| 5 | 15.3B EUR (≈$16.8B) | 82 | 57 | |
| 21 | 6.5B AUD (≈$4.3B) | 49 | 61 | |
| 22 | 5.3B USD | 48 | 52 | |
| 23 | 8.9B USD | 46 | 50 | |
| 23 | 15.1B USD | 46 | 49 | |
| 25 | 8.4B USD | 45 | 63 | |
| 26 | 15.1B USD | 44 | 38 | |
| 27 | 13.1B AUD (≈$8.6B) | 43 | 55 | |
| 27 | 11.8B USD | 43 | 51 | |
| 29 | 12.7B USD | 41 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score