Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Diamondback Energy, Inc.
How Diamondback Energy, Inc. stacks up
FANG · against 36 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
78/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #6 of 37 · scores higher than 86% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score2 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including FANG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 78?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 91% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -66.8% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 85% of peers. Revenue growth: 21.4% vs peer median 0.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 95% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 27.2% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FANG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FANG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 37 reported | 21.4% | 2.5% | 92% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 37 reported | -66.8% | 2.9% | 0% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 37 reported | 27.2% | -1.1% | 100% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FANG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 31.6B USD | 96 | 56 | |
| 2 | 33.9B USD | 91 | 71 | |
| 2 | 58.0B USD | 91 | 48 | |
| 4 | 60.4B USD | 89 | 77 | |
| 5 | 69.4B USD | 82 | 49 | |
| 6 | 53.9B USD | 78 | 42 | |
| 7 | 81.4B USD | 73 | 78 | |
| 8 | 73.2B USD | 69 | 44 | |
| 9 | 88.6B USD | 66 | 40 | |
| 10 | 58.3B USD | 65 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score