Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to First Advantage Corporation
How First Advantage Corporation stacks up
FA · against 445 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
98/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #13 of 446 · scores higher than 97% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score78 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including FA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 98?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 7.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 93% of peers. Revenue growth: 32.9% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 96% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 28.7% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 462 reported | 32.9% | 8.4% | 88% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 328 reported | Not reported | 9.2% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 437 reported | 28.7% | 5.2% | 92% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 727M USD | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 7 | 12.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 7 | 5.5B USD | 99 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score