Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
F · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #1,096 of 1,553 · scores higher than 29% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including F · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | F | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | -15.3% | 4.4% | 7% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 4.0% | 8.8% | 22% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 14.8% | 6.1% | 81% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 72.8% | 57.2% | 60% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1,096 | 101.8B THB (≈$2.9B) | 29 | 52 | |
| 1,096 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 8.9B SEK (≈$889M) |
| 29 |
| 38 |
| 1,096 | 24.6B USD | 29 | 56 |
| 1,096 | 9.3B EUR (≈$10.2B) | 29 | 38 |
| 1,096 | 49.1B USD | 29 | 15 |
| 1,096 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 29 | 73 |
| 1,096 | 72.8B USD | 29 | 50 |
| 1,096 | 137.5B EUR (≈$151.2B) | 29 | 70 |
| 1,111 | 5.0B CNY (≈$697M) | 28 | 36 |