Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ford Motor Company
How Ford Motor Company stacks up
F · against 57 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
29/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #44 of 58 · scores higher than 19% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score11 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including F · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 29?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -15.0% vs peer median 4.4%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 78% of peers. EBITDA yield: 4.0% vs peer median 8.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 81% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 14.8% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = F, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | F | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 56 reported | -15.3% | 4.6% | 0% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 59 reported | 4.0% | 6.6% | 19% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 35 reported | 14.8% | 3.8% | 94% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 57 reported | 72.8% | 15.6% | 86% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around F| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 219.5B CNY (≈$30.7B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 2 | 37.54T KRW (≈$27.0B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 3 | 4.04T JPY (≈$27.5B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 4 | 200.3B HKD (≈$25.6B) | 88 | 55 | |
| 5 | 659.6B HKD (≈$84.4B) | 86 | 72 | |
| 40 | 74.3B USD | 31 | 66 | |
| 43 | 42.1B USD | 30 | 58 | |
| 44 | 72.66T KRW (≈$52.3B) | 29 | 32 | |
| 44 | 24.6B USD | 29 | 56 | |
| 44 | 49.1B USD | 29 | 15 | |
| 44 | 72.8B USD | 29 | 50 | |
| 48 | 38.3B USD | 28 | 57 | |
| 49 | 89.1B AUD (≈$58.8B) | 26 | 41 | |
| 50 | 24.9B USD | 25 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score