Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Extra Space Storage Inc.
How Extra Space Storage Inc. stacks up
EXR · against 179 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Growth
67/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #68 of 180 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score22 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including EXR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 67?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 65% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -1.4% vs peer median 11.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.2% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 88% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 19.5% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EXR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EXR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 182 reported | 4.2% | 5.9% | 39% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 133 reported | -1.4% | 13.9% | 34% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 174 reported | 19.5% | 4.8% | 89% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EXR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 3 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 4 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 4 | 34.7B USD | 98 | 45 | |
| 64 | 468M USD | 70 | 50 | |
| 65 | 7.5B USD | 68 | 61 | |
| 65 | 14.1B USD | 68 | 69 | |
| 65 | 795M USD | 68 | 48 | |
| 68 | 34.5B USD | 67 | 51 | |
| 68 | 17.9B USD | 67 | 67 | |
| 70 | 255M USD | 66 | 71 | |
| 70 | Unavailable | 66 | 58 | |
| 70 | 1.2B USD | 66 | 72 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score