Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Exponent, Inc.
How Exponent, Inc. stacks up
EXPO · against 512 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
30/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #410 of 513 · scores higher than 19% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score50 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including EXPO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 30?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 72% of peers. EBITDA yield: 3.7% vs peer median 6.9%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.7% vs peer median 3.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.7% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EXPO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EXPO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 507 reported | 2.7% | 4.4% | 26% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 518 reported | 3.7% | 7.8% | 16% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 203 reported | 2.7% | 4.2% | 39% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 508 reported | 7.4% | 42.0% | 3% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EXPO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 4 | 22.0B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 4 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 402 | 26.3B SEK (≈$2.6B) | 31 | 34 | |
| 402 | 9.1B AUD (≈$6.0B) | 31 | 42 | |
| 410 | 17.8B CNY (≈$2.5B) | 30 | 46 | |
| 410 | 33.4B CNY (≈$4.7B) | 30 | 30 | |
| 410 | 4.1B USD | 30 | 59 | |
| 410 | 48.0B SEK (≈$4.8B) | 30 | 52 | |
| 410 | 23.6B SEK (≈$2.4B) | 30 | 61 | |
| 410 | 3.3B SGD (≈$2.5B) | 30 | 56 | |
| 416 | 9.04T KRW (≈$6.5B) | 29 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score