Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Exponent, Inc.
How Exponent, Inc. stacks up
EXPO · against 515 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #333 of 516 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score61 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including EXPO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -1.9% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.2% vs peer median 4.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.3% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EXPO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EXPO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 517 reported | 4.2% | 7.0% | 39% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 447 reported | -1.9% | 9.1% | 35% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 513 reported | 4.3% | 6.5% | 38% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EXPO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 100 | 58 | |
| 328 | 426.2B JPY (≈$2.9B) | 46 | 60 | |
| 328 | 45.8B DKK (≈$6.9B) | 46 | 42 | |
| 333 | 450.3B JPY (≈$3.1B) | 45 | 58 | |
| 333 | 82.2B ZAR (≈$4.5B) | 45 | 59 | |
| 333 | 4.1B USD | 45 | 59 | |
| 333 | 6.7B USD | 45 | 53 | |
| 333 | 2.8B GBP (≈$3.6B) | 45 | 60 | |
| 333 | 4.9B CAD (≈$3.6B) | 45 | 53 | |
| 339 | 1.8B CHF (≈$2.1B) | 44 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score