Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ExlService Holdings, Inc.
How ExlService Holdings, Inc. stacks up
EXLS · against 298 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
63/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #104 of 299 · scores higher than 63% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score45 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including EXLS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 63?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.1% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 61% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.3% vs peer median 2.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 65% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.9% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EXLS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EXLS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 296 reported | 3.8% | 2.5% | 66% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 302 reported | 5.8% | 4.2% | 61% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 149 reported | 4.3% | 2.9% | 64% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 297 reported | 13.6% | 23.6% | 23% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EXLS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 1 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 98 | 94 | |
| 1 | 40.9B CNY (≈$5.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 4 | 31.1B HKD (≈$4.0B) | 97 | 59 | |
| 4 | 6.3B USD | 97 | 55 | |
| 104 | 42.7B CNY (≈$6.0B) | 63 | 81 | |
| 104 | 92.8B HKD (≈$11.9B) | 63 | 43 | |
| 104 | 205.2B TWD (≈$6.4B) | 63 | 42 | |
| 104 | 197.3B TWD (≈$6.1B) | 63 | 78 | |
| 104 | 6.4B USD | 63 | 62 | |
| 104 | 483.8B INR (≈$5.8B) | 63 | 62 | |
| 112 | 108.0B TWD (≈$3.3B) | 62 | 63 | |
| 112 | 3.2B USD | 62 | 67 | |
| 112 | 11.9B USD | 62 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score