Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EXK · against 1,354 other Basic Materials companies
Ranked #1,093 of 1,355 · scores higher than 19% of peers · safety percentile 19
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)135 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including EXK · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, which is weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | EXK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,322 reported | 0.35× | 0.36× | 51% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,325 reported | 2.44 | 0.66 | 1% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,285 reported | 1.97× | 1.77× | 56% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26.3B INR (≈$316M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 226M USD | 100 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.4B CNY (≈$902M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 3 | 7.6B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 3 | 17.3B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1,089 | 27.0B USD | 20 | 54 | |
| 1,090 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 23.7B AUD (≈$15.7B) |
| 20 |
| 63 |
| 1,091 | 1.2B EUR (≈$1.3B) | 19 | 22 |
| 1,092 | 26.2B CNY (≈$3.7B) | 19 | 33 |
| 1,093 | 2.1B USD | 19 | 39 |
| 1,094 | 23.0B TWD (≈$712M) | 19 | 8 |
| 1,095 | 75.9B JPY (≈$516M) | 19 | 42 |
| 1,096 | 1.0B EUR (≈$1.1B) | 19 | 25 |
| 1,097 | 4.0B CNY (≈$556M) | 19 | 38 |