Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EU · against 12 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #2 of 13 · scores higher than 92% of peers · safety percentile 90
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)4 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including EU · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | EU | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 11 reported | 0.46× | 0.37× | 20% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 11 reported | 1.39 | 0.55 | 10% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 14 reported | 8.00× | 2.24× | 100% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 126M SGD (≈$96M) | 92 | 69 | |
| 2 | 134M USD | 90 | 45 | |
| 3 | 261M USD | 89 | 56 | |
| 4 | 846M HKD (≈$108M) | 85 | 32 | |
| 5 | 153M GBP (≈$200M) | 80 | 32 | |
| 6 | 199M USD | 80 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score