Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Entergy Texas, Inc.
How Entergy Texas, Inc. stacks up
ETI-P · against 357 other Utilities companies
Profitability
58/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #150 of 358 · scores higher than 58% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score36 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including ETI-P · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Its metrics sit close to the Utilities norm.
- Return on invested capital is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 3.0% vs peer median 2.7%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 61% of peers. Operating margin: 21.6% vs peer median 18.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ETI-P, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ETI-P | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 349 reported | Not reported | 5.2% | — | — | 33% |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 353 reported | 21.6% | 18.6% | 61% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 345 reported | 3.0% | 2.7% | 55% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 342 reported | 8.9% | 8.1% | 56% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 361 reported | 42.3% | 35.5% | 64% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ETI-P| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B BRL (≈$561M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 1 | 1.62T CLP (≈$1.8B) | 100 | 56 | |
| 3 | 7.9B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 85 | |
| 3 | 15.9B BRL (≈$2.9B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 3 | 15.5B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 146 | 30.5B USD | 59 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score