Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Entergy Texas, Inc.
How Entergy Texas, Inc. stacks up
ETI-P · against 93 other Utilities companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
97/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #1 of 94 · scores higher than 100% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score6 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including ETI-P · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 97?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Utilities peers.
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 93% of peers. EBITDA yield: 17.1% vs peer median 8.6%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 97% of peers. Earnings yield: 19.3% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ETI-P, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ETI-P | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 91 reported | 19.3% | 4.5% | 96% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 93 reported | 17.1% | 7.7% | 98% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 87 reported | Not reported | -4.6% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 88 reported | 467.6% | 51.9% | 100% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ETI-P| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unavailable | 97 | 69 | |
| 2 | 710M USD | 96 | 72 | |
| 2 | 1.5B USD | 96 | 67 | |
| 4 | 13.6B USD | 93 | 57 | |
| 5 | 1.5B USD | 92 | 93 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score