Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.
How Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. stacks up
ETD · against 1,585 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Growth
12/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #1,388 of 1,586 · scores higher than 12% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score159 peers with a growth score of 10–19, including ETD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 12?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth, revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 92% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -9.9% vs peer median 4.3%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 82% of peers. Revenue growth: -5.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 76% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -22.0% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ETD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ETD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,593 reported | -5.7% | 3.7% | 18% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,125 reported | -22.0% | 4.1% | 24% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,578 reported | -9.9% | 4.3% | 8% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ETD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 241M MYR (≈$53M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 1,388 | 3.3B CNY (≈$461M) | 12 | 14 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score