Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Energy Transfer LP
How Energy Transfer LP stacks up
ET · against 33 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
56/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #12 of 34 · scores higher than 67% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score6 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including ET · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 12.3% vs peer median 12.1%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 61% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 7.5% vs peer median 6.2%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 64% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.6% vs peer median 5.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ET, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ET | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 34 reported | 7.2% | 6.9% | 64% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 34 reported | 10.8% | 10.4% | 52% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 30 reported | 7.5% | 5.8% | 72% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 32 reported | 46.1% | 38.0% | 74% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ET| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.92T INR (≈$35.0B) | 86 | 56 | |
| 2 | 108.0B USD | 79 | 55 | |
| 3 | 60.4B USD | 77 | 77 | |
| 4 | 135.8B USD | 76 | 60 | |
| 5 | 32.3B EUR (≈$35.5B) | 75 | 59 | |
| 8 | 56.7B USD | 63 | 57 | |
| 9 | 52.4B USD | 61 | 57 | |
| 9 | 42.5B USD | 61 | 56 | |
| 11 | 120.0B USD | 59 | 62 | |
| 12 | 69.4B USD | 56 | 49 | |
| 13 | 89.1B USD | 55 | 59 | |
| 14 | 934.4B HKD (≈$119.6B) | 54 | 58 | |
| 15 | 122.6B USD | 52 | 32 | |
| 16 | 110.5B USD | 50 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score