Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Essex Property Trust, Inc.
How Essex Property Trust, Inc. stacks up
ESS · against 49 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
36/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #35 of 50 · scores higher than 31% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score9 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including ESS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 36?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 67% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.6% vs peer median 5.3%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.4% vs peer median 6.5%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.3% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ESS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ESS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 51 reported | 2.4% | 3.9% | 18% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 48 reported | 5.2% | 5.6% | 34% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 33 reported | 5.4% | 5.4% | 50% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 51 reported | 31.3% | 51.5% | 20% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ESS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.85T JPY (≈$19.4B) | 90 | 67 | |
| 2 | 10.1B USD | 87 | 53 | |
| 3 | 13.7B USD | 81 | 70 | |
| 4 | 26.9B USD | 77 | 78 | |
| 4 | 13.8B EUR (≈$15.2B) | 77 | 36 | |
| 31 | 11.7B USD | 39 | 49 | |
| 32 | 26.3B USD | 38 | 41 | |
| 32 | 10.0B USD | 38 | 45 | |
| 34 | 11.3B USD | 37 | 44 | |
| 35 | 18.3B USD | 36 | 38 | |
| 36 | 18.1B SGD (≈$13.8B) | 32 | 55 | |
| 36 | 13.9B USD | 32 | 43 | |
| 38 | 34.5B USD | 31 | 51 | |
| 39 | 148.3B HKD (≈$19.0B) | 30 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score