Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EROK · against 398 other Energy companies
Ranked #50 of 399 · scores higher than 88% of peers · safety percentile 88
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including EROK · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | EROK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 392 reported | 0.00× | 0.49× | 100% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 392 reported | Not reported | 0.48 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 395 reported | 2.06× | 1.37× | 75% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 41M USD | 99 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 46 | 2.0B MYR (≈$443M) | 89 | 61 | |
| 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 496M USD |
| 88 |
| 85 |
| 48 | 400M EUR (≈$440M) | 88 | 77 |
| 49 | 3.9B USD | 88 | 72 |
| 50 | 2.5B USD | 88 | 41 |
| 51 | 548M GBP (≈$712M) | 87 | 60 |
| 52 | 64.6B THB (≈$1.8B) | 87 | 78 |
| 53 | 4.7B AUD (≈$3.1B) | 87 | 47 |
| 54 | 96M MYR (≈$21M) | 87 | 74 |