Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EQX · against 1,354 other Basic Materials companies
Ranked #1,187 of 1,355 · scores higher than 12% of peers · safety percentile 12
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)135 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including EQX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | EQX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,322 reported | 0.13× | 0.36× | 71% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,325 reported | 2.53 | 0.66 | 1% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,285 reported | 1.33× | 1.77× | 31% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26.3B INR (≈$316M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 226M USD | 100 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.4B CNY (≈$902M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 3 | 7.6B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 3 | 17.3B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1,183 | 3.4B CNY (≈$471M) | 13 | 7 | |
| 1,184 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 3.4B CNY (≈$480M) |
| 13 |
| 36 |
| 1,185 | 17.4B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 13 | 42 |
| 1,186 | 6.8B CNY (≈$956M) | 12 | 32 |
| 1,187 | 11.7B USD | 12 | 50 |
| 1,188 | 29.4B CHF (≈$33.8B) | 12 | 41 |
| 1,189 | 2.5B EUR (≈$2.8B) | 12 | 32 |
| 1,190 | 3.3B CNY (≈$466M) | 12 | 15 |
| 1,191 | 5.7B CNY (≈$795M) | 12 | 35 |