Ranked #499 of 528 · scores higher than 6% of peers · safety percentile 6
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)
49 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including EQPT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why “Higher relative risk”?
The measures below combine into a safety percentile of 6 among Industrials companies. It is relative: 67 or more is lower relative risk, 33–66 moderate, below 33 higher.
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
▼more borrowing relative to shareholders' equity: weaker than 96% of peers. Debt / equity: 3.00× vs peer median 0.40×
●Beta is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
▲more short-term assets to cover bills due within a year: stronger than 75% of peers. Current ratio: 2.42× vs peer median 1.62×
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EQPT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
EQPT
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Debt / equityLower is better · 520 reported
3.04×
0.49×
3%
33%
BetaLower is better · 513 reported
Not reported
0.73
—
—
33%
Current ratioHigher is better · 503 reported
2.42×
1.55×
80%
33%
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
