Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.
How Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. stacks up
EOSE · against 2,439 other Industrials companies
Profitability
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #2,379 of 2,440 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score232 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including EOSE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its return on assets and operating margin, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 100% of peers. Return on assets: -58.3% vs peer median 3.1%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 99% of peers. Operating margin: -142.6% vs peer median 7.7%
- Return on invested capital is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EOSE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EOSE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 2,323 reported | Not reported | 7.1% | — | — | 33% |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 2,434 reported | -142.6% | 7.7% | 1% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 2,336 reported | -58.3% | 3.1% | 0% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 2,300 reported | Not reported | 8.0% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 2,460 reported | -84.7% | 25.8% | 0% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EOSE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14.9B CNY (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 5.5B CNY (≈$769M) | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 13.8B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 100 | 89 | |
| 1 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 51M MYR (≈$11M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 2,379 | 12M USD | 0 | 32 | |
| 2,379 | 290M USD | 0 | 36 | |
| 2,379 | 574M ILS (≈$155M) | 0 | 35 | |
| 2,379 | 645M USD | 0 | 31 | |
| 2,379 | 687M USD | 0 | 28 | |
| 2,379 | 896M USD | 0 | 34 | |
| 2,379 | 20M ILS (≈$5M) | 0 | 9 | |
| 2,379 | 171M NOK (≈$16M) | 0 | 5 | |
| 2,379 | 41M GBP (≈$54M) | 0 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score