Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EOLS · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #1,328 of 1,373 · scores higher than 3% of peers · safety percentile 3
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)138 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including EOLS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | EOLS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | Not reported | 0.24× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 1.34 | 0.53 | 14% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 1.70× | 2.62× | 33% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 1,324 | 758M USD | 4 | 35 | |
| 1,325 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 377M USD |
| 3 |
| 29 |
| 1,326 | 21.5B USD | 3 | 60 |
| 1,327 | 2.4B USD | 3 | 6 |
| 1,328 | 487M USD | 3 | 29 |
| 1,329 | 34.0B USD | 3 | 49 |
| 1,330 | 4.3B USD | 3 | 69 |
| 1,331 | 107M USD | 3 | 31 |
| 1,332 | 43.2B USD | 3 | 45 |