Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ENVA · against 73 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #25 of 74 · scores higher than 67% of peers · safety percentile 63
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)9 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including ENVA · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta and debt / equity than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ENVA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 69 reported | 3.45× | 0.78× | 19% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 76 reported | 1.39 | 0.71 | 9% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 64 reported | 12.50× | 2.37× | 92% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 231.2B INR (≈$2.8B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 2 | 7.1B EUR (≈$7.8B) | 93 | ||
| 3 | 5.0B USD | 92 | 47 | |
| 4 | 4.3B USD | 89 | 62 | |
| 5 | 2.3B EUR (≈$2.5B) | 88 | 76 | |
| 21 | 2.5B USD | 64 | 56 | |
| 22 | 2.9B EUR (≈$3.2B) | 64 | 45 | |
| 23 | 3.8B GBP (≈$4.9B) | 64 | 55 | |
| 24 | 4.6B USD | 63 | 70 | |
| 25 | 4.3B USD | 63 | 70 | |
| 26 | 3.9B USD | 62 | 40 | |
| 27 | 6.5B AUD (≈$4.3B) | 61 | 61 | |
| 28 | 5.9B USD | 59 | 69 | |
| 29 | 23.7B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 57 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score