Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ENSG · against 156 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #66 of 157 · scores higher than 58% of peers · safety percentile 51
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)18 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including ENSG · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ENSG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 151 reported | 0.92× | 0.34× | 19% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 159 reported | 0.66 | 0.58 | 45% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 148 reported | 1.21× | 2.30× | 16% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 10.1B EUR (≈$11.1B) | 99 | ||
| 4 | 9.0B USD | 98 | 51 | |
| 5 | 5.7B USD | 97 | 52 | |
| 62 | 47.7B CNY (≈$6.7B) | 53 | 64 | |
| 63 | 11.4B USD | 52 | 64 | |
| 64 | 10.4B USD | 52 | 70 | |
| 65 | 64.1B CNY (≈$9.0B) | 52 | 45 | |
| 66 | 10.6B USD | 51 | 64 | |
| 67 | 27.5B NZD (≈$16.5B) | 50 | 69 | |
| 68 | 62.5B SEK (≈$6.3B) | 48 | 60 | |
| 69 | 7.0B USD | 48 | 63 | |
| 70 | 1.26T INR (≈$15.1B) | 48 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score