Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Enel Chile S.A.
How Enel Chile S.A. stacks up
ENIC · against 84 other Utilities companies of similar size
Growth
93/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #7 of 85 · scores higher than 93% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score11 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including ENIC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 93?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Utilities peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 77% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -4.2% vs peer median 2.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 75% of peers. Revenue growth: 9.0% vs peer median 2.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 98% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 271.4% vs peer median 1.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ENIC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ENIC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 85 reported | 9.0% | 1.2% | 75% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 73 reported | 271.4% | 0.5% | 96% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 85 reported | -4.2% | 1.4% | 24% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ENIC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 48.3B BRL (≈$8.7B) | 100 | 69 | |
| 1 | 9.1B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 98 | 77 | |
| 4 | 9.1B EUR (≈$10.0B) | 96 | 61 | |
| 4 | 921.0B INR (≈$11.1B) | 96 | 60 | |
| 6 | 32.7B CNY (≈$4.6B) | 94 | 57 | |
| 7 | 5.9B USD | 93 | 73 | |
| 8 | 10.6B USD | 92 | 54 | |
| 9 | 9.4B NZD (≈$5.6B) | 91 | 69 | |
| 9 | 5.8B USD | 91 | 41 | |
| 11 | 5.2B USD | 90 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score