Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Enhanced Group Inc.
How Enhanced Group Inc. stacks up
ENHA · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Valuation
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #771 of 799 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score76 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including ENHA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -120.1% vs peer median 8.7%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -113.6% vs peer median 4.5%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ENHA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ENHA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | -113.6% | 4.5% | 1% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | -120.1% | 8.9% | 0% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | Not reported | 6.3% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | 3.3% | 54.4% | 3% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ENHA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 771 | 4.4B CNY (≈$617M) | 0 | 23 | |
| 771 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score