Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ENHA · against 66 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #65 of 67 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score12 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including ENHA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
| Metric | ENHA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 62 reported | -113.6% | 5.9% | 2% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 72 reported | -120.1% | 13.1% | 0% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 41 reported | Not reported | 8.8% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 64 reported | 3.3% | 126.4% | 2% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 3 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 3 | 1.4B HKD (≈$177M) | 98 | 83 | |
| 3 | 847M HKD (≈$108M) | 98 | 75 | |
| 60 | 125M USD | 5 | 3 | |
| 60 | 549M NOK (≈$52M) | 5 | 26 | |
| 60 | 182M USD | 5 | 16 | |
| 65 | 1.2B CNY (≈$172M) | 0 | 31 | |
| 65 | 97M USD | 0 | ||
| 65 | 308M NZD (≈$185M) | 0 | 18 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score