Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EMA · against 72 other Utilities companies of similar size
Ranked #40 of 73 · scores higher than 46% of peers · safety percentile 34
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)6 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including EMA · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Utilities norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | EMA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 73 reported | 1.54× | 1.51× | 49% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 72 reported | 0.43 | 0.46 | 55% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 69 reported | 0.73× | 0.92× | 24% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20.3B EUR (≈$22.4B) | 91 | 42 | |
| 2 | 23.3B USD | 89 | 78 | |
| 3 | 2.24T JPY (≈$15.2B) | 86 | 55 | |
| 4 | 21.3B EUR (≈$23.4B) | 83 | 36 | |
| 5 | 179.3B DKK (≈$26.9B) | 83 | 53 | |
| 36 | 22.0B USD | 40 | 44 | |
| 37 | 45.0B MYR (≈$9.9B) | 39 | 39 | |
| 38 | 11.3B GBP (≈$14.7B) | 38 | 66 | |
| 39 | 28.0B USD | 35 | 46 | |
| 40 | 15.4B USD | 34 | 54 | |
| 41 | 26.9B USD | 33 | 50 | |
| 42 | 7.4B EUR (≈$8.2B) | 32 | 49 | |
| 43 | 30.5B USD | 29 | 45 | |
| 44 | 12.5B USD | 28 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score