Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ELS · against 82 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Ranked #72 of 83 · scores higher than 13% of peers · safety percentile 14
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)11 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including ELS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ELS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 82 reported | 1.82× | 0.72× | 10% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 82 reported | 0.64 | 0.83 | 74% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 80 reported | 0.14× | 0.78× | 8% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60.5B HKD (≈$7.7B) | 94 | 54 | |
| 2 | 609.8B INR (≈$7.3B) | 90 | 78 | |
| 3 | 11.7B USD | 89 | 80 | |
| 4 | 8.7B USD | 89 | 77 | |
| 5 | 17.6B USD | 87 | 37 | |
| 68 | 10.0B USD | 15 | 45 | |
| 69 | 6.7B EUR (≈$7.3B) | 15 | 51 | |
| 70 | 9.0B USD | 15 | 52 | |
| 71 | 83.6B SEK (≈$8.4B) | 14 | 47 | |
| 72 | 12.1B USD | 14 | 43 | |
| 73 | 13.8B EUR (≈$15.2B) | 14 | 36 | |
| 74 | 13.2B USD | 13 | 63 | |
| 75 | 54.5B BRL (≈$9.8B) | 10 | 53 | |
| 76 | 11.3B USD | 10 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score