Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ELPC · against 359 other Utilities companies
Ranked #121 of 360 · scores higher than 67% of peers · safety percentile 67
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)36 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including ELPC · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Utilities norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ELPC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 354 reported | 0.98× | 1.21× | 60% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 347 reported | 0.26 | 0.40 | 69% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 347 reported | 1.30× | 1.05× | 68% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.9B CNY (≈$260M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$297M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$286M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 369M USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2.7B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 117 | 2.00T CLP (≈$2.2B) | 68 | 78 | |
| 118 | 28.3B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 67 | 53 | |
| 119 | 33.8B INR (≈$406M) | 67 | 27 | |
| 120 | 10.2B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 67 | 39 | |
| 121 | 7.6B USD | 67 | 46 | |
| 122 | 4.6B CNY (≈$650M) | 66 | 55 | |
| 123 | 48.3B BRL (≈$8.7B) | 66 | 69 | |
| 124 | 7.3B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 66 | 74 | |
| 125 | 2.96T JPY (≈$20.1B) | 65 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score