Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ELPC · against 85 other Utilities companies of similar size
Ranked #23 of 86 · scores higher than 74% of peers · safety percentile 67
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)11 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including ELPC · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Utilities norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ELPC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 86 reported | 0.98× | 1.23× | 64% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 84 reported | 0.26 | 0.46 | 77% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 81 reported | 1.30× | 0.96× | 81% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29.9B CNY (≈$4.2B) | 92 | 65 | |
| 2 | 4.4B USD | 91 | 31 | |
| 3 | 6.6B CHF (≈$7.5B) | 90 | 48 | |
| 4 | 9.1B NZD (≈$5.4B) | 89 | 70 | |
| 5 | 5.4B USD | 84 | 77 | |
| 19 | 1.22T INR (≈$14.7B) | 70 | 65 | |
| 20 | 51.5B HKD (≈$6.6B) | 69 | 68 | |
| 21 | 21.0B AUD (≈$13.8B) | 68 | 50 | |
| 22 | 28.3B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 67 | 53 | |
| 23 | 7.6B USD | 67 | 46 | |
| 24 | 48.3B BRL (≈$8.7B) | 66 | 69 | |
| 25 | 40.4B BRL (≈$7.3B) | 65 | 70 | |
| 26 | 13.8B EUR (≈$15.2B) | 64 | 64 | |
| 27 | 962.3B JPY (≈$6.5B) | 63 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score