Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ELMT · against 2,393 other Industrials companies
Ranked #2,024 of 2,394 · scores higher than 15% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score197 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including ELMT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
| Metric | ELMT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2,368 reported | -1.8% | 3.8% | 14% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2,432 reported | 1.8% | 7.0% | 18% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 795 reported | -1.8% | 3.7% | 21% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2,381 reported | 27.9% | 50.5% | 27% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 2,024 | 6.8B CNY (≈$947M) | 15 | 15 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 2,024 | 3.5B CNY (≈$484M) | 15 | 37 |
| 2,024 | 6.6B CNY (≈$924M) | 15 | 34 |
| 2,024 | 63.0B USD | 15 | 55 |
| 2,024 | 672M USD | 15 | 38 |
| 2,024 | 568M USD | 15 | 23 |
| 2,024 | 7.7B USD | 15 | 55 |
| 2,024 | 1.22T INR (≈$14.6B) | 15 | 72 |
| 2,024 | 183M USD | 15 | 13 |