Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.
How e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. stacks up
ELF · against 147 other Consumer Defensive companies listed in US-listed
Growth
94/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #12 of 148 · scores higher than 92% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score21 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including ELF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 94?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 84% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -41.4% vs peer median 1.5%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 95% of peers. Revenue growth: 31.2% vs peer median 2.8%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 98% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 37.9% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ELF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ELF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 152 reported | 31.2% | 4.1% | 93% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 109 reported | -41.4% | 4.5% | 18% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 147 reported | 37.9% | 3.5% | 98% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ELF| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.5B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 2 | 536M USD | 99 | 39 | |
| 3 | 3.3B USD | 98 | 71 | |
| 3 | 607M USD | 98 | 67 | |
| 5 | 3.5B USD | 97 | 73 | |
| 8 | 7.6B USD | 96 | 45 | |
| 8 | 650M USD | 96 | 55 | |
| 8 | 426M USD | 96 | 48 | |
| 8 | 925M USD | 96 | 49 | |
| 12 | 6.6B USD | 94 | 43 | |
| 12 | 925M USD | 94 | 29 | |
| 14 | 336M USD | 93 | 63 | |
| 14 | 7.6B USD | 93 | 33 | |
| 16 | 7.5B USD | 92 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score