Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EGO · against 1,354 other Basic Materials companies
Ranked #1,019 of 1,355 · scores higher than 25% of peers · safety percentile 25
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)136 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including EGO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | EGO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,322 reported | 0.29× | 0.36× | 56% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,325 reported | 1.51 | 0.66 | 9% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,285 reported | 1.42× | 1.77× | 36% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26.3B INR (≈$316M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 226M USD | 100 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.4B CNY (≈$902M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 3 | 7.6B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 3 | 17.3B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1,015 | 1.03T KRW (≈$744M) | 25 | 47 | |
| 1,016 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 5.2B CNY (≈$721M) |
| 25 |
| 52 |
| 1,017 | 408M AUD (≈$269M) | 25 | 73 |
| 1,018 | 4.1B CNY (≈$570M) | 25 | 36 |
| 1,019 | 8.3B USD | 25 | 66 |
| 1,020 | 1.3B USD | 25 | 40 |
| 1,021 | 4.7B CNY (≈$653M) | 25 | 12 |
| 1,022 | 3.0B CNY (≈$419M) | 25 | 16 |
| 1,023 | 740M HKD (≈$95M) | 25 | 36 |