Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Enerflex Ltd.
How Enerflex Ltd. stacks up
EFXT · against 385 other Energy companies
Growth
90/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #38 of 386 · scores higher than 90% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score41 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including EFXT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 90?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 62% of peers. Revenue growth: 6.5% vs peer median 0.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 88% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 103.8% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 94% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 25.2% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EFXT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EFXT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 394 reported | 6.5% | 0.5% | 62% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 292 reported | 103.8% | 1.0% | 88% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 383 reported | 25.2% | -1.3% | 94% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EFXT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 203M MYR (≈$45M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 34 | 58.0B USD | 91 | 48 | |
| 34 | 20.1B USD | 91 | 65 | |
| 38 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 90 | 80 | |
| 38 | 5.0B USD | 90 | 46 | |
| 38 | 2.8B USD | 90 | 49 | |
| 38 | 7.5B USD | 90 | 79 | |
| 42 | 10.9B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 89 | 36 | |
| 42 | 6.9B EUR (≈$7.6B) | 89 | 76 | |
| 42 | 25.0B NOK (≈$2.4B) | 89 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score