Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Enerflex Ltd.
How Enerflex Ltd. stacks up
EFXT · against 127 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
90/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #12 of 128 · scores higher than 91% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score13 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including EFXT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 90?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 62% of peers. Revenue growth: 6.5% vs peer median 0.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 88% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 103.8% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 94% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 25.2% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EFXT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EFXT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 131 reported | 6.5% | 0.5% | 61% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 94 reported | 103.8% | -1.4% | 88% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 127 reported | 25.2% | -3.2% | 94% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EFXT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 49 | |
| 4 | 4.1B USD | 98 | 60 | |
| 4 | 4.7B USD | 98 | 56 | |
| 8 | 1.3B GBP (≈$1.7B) | 95 | 57 | |
| 10 | 17.6B NOK (≈$1.7B) | 93 | 75 | |
| 11 | 5.1B USD | 91 | 55 | |
| 12 | 5.0B USD | 90 | 46 | |
| 12 | 2.8B USD | 90 | 49 | |
| 14 | 10.9B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 89 | 36 | |
| 14 | 25.0B NOK (≈$2.4B) | 89 | 57 | |
| 16 | 2.9B USD | 87 | 77 | |
| 16 | 3.6B USD | 87 | 85 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score