Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EFT · against 398 other Financial Services companies
Ranked #205 of 399 · scores higher than 49% of peers · safety percentile 49
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)39 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including EFT · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger beta, but weaker current ratio than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | EFT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 349 reported | 0.46× | 0.57× | 56% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 394 reported | 0.43 | 0.67 | 72% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 372 reported | 0.22× | 2.04× | 5% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 344M MYR (≈$76M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 2 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 3 | 24.8B JPY (≈$168M) | 99 | 25 | |
| 4 | 0M MYR (≈$0M) | 99 | ||
| 5 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 201 | 22M AUD (≈$14M) | 50 | 56 | |
| 202 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 70.1B USD |
| 49 |
| 45 |
| 203 | 458M USD | 49 |
| 204 | 18M AUD (≈$12M) | 49 | 27 |
| 205 | 281M USD | 49 |
| 206 | 1.5B USD | 48 |
| 207 | 322M USD | 48 | 58 |
| 208 | 21.7B THB (≈$607M) | 48 | 52 |
| 209 | 23.7B USD | 48 | 59 |