Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EFC · against 759 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #582 of 760 · scores higher than 23% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score75 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including EFC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its return on invested capital and return on assets, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
| Metric | EFC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 739 reported | 1.0% | 3.4% | 21% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 728 reported | Not reported | 26.8% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 741 reported | 1.1% | 2.1% | 31% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 721 reported | 12.2% | 5.2% | 86% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 763 reported | 100.0% | 53.9% | 98% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 310M USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 17.42T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 12.2B BRL (≈$2.2B) | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 609.8B INR (≈$7.3B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 5 | 91.4B HKD (≈$11.7B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 575 | 42.0B THB (≈$1.2B) | 24 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 27 |
| 582 | 574M HKD (≈$73M) | 23 | 42 |
| 582 | 944M EUR (≈$1.0B) | 23 | 25 |
| 582 | 13.9B USD | 23 | 43 |
| 582 | 1.5B USD | 23 | 47 |
| 582 | 5.9B USD | 23 | 43 |
| 582 | 5.2B USD | 23 | 44 |
| 582 | 1.1B SGD (≈$813M) | 23 | 59 |
| 582 | 2.1B USD | 23 | 32 |