Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ellington Financial Inc.
How Ellington Financial Inc. stacks up
EFC · against 236 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Profitability
23/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #193 of 237 · scores higher than 17% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score21 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including EFC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 23?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital and return on assets, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 79% of peers. Return on invested capital: 1.0% vs peer median 3.4%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 69% of peers. Return on assets: 1.1% vs peer median 2.1%
- Operating margin is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EFC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EFC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 233 reported | 1.0% | 3.6% | 16% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 226 reported | Not reported | 37.5% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 232 reported | 1.1% | 2.3% | 26% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 228 reported | 12.2% | 6.0% | 85% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 237 reported | 100.0% | 58.6% | 97% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EFC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.42T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 12.2B BRL (≈$2.2B) | 100 | 83 | |
| 3 | 44.3B TWD (≈$1.4B) | 99 | 94 | |
| 3 | 7.7B BRL (≈$1.4B) | 99 | 90 | |
| 3 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 91 | |
| 190 | 2.0B USD | 25 | 24 | |
| 190 | 2.0B GBP (≈$2.6B) | 25 | 26 | |
| 192 | 42.0B THB (≈$1.2B) | 24 | 27 | |
| 193 | 944M EUR (≈$1.0B) | 23 | 25 | |
| 193 | 1.5B USD | 23 | 47 | |
| 193 | 1.1B SGD (≈$813M) | 23 | 59 | |
| 193 | 2.1B USD | 23 | 32 | |
| 197 | 9.0B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 22 | 18 | |
| 197 | 5.6B CNY (≈$786M) | 22 | 33 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score