Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EDU · against 112 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #26 of 113 · scores higher than 78% of peers · safety percentile 71
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)14 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including EDU · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and beta, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | EDU | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 112 reported | 0.19× | 0.48× | 70% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 109 reported | 0.24 | 0.32 | 60% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 106 reported | 1.61× | 1.44× | 60% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.06T JPY (≈$7.2B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 2 | 58.1B CNY (≈$8.1B) | 94 | 39 | |
| 3 | 37.3B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 91 | 63 | |
| 4 | 1.68T JPY (≈$11.4B) | 91 | 64 | |
| 5 | 18.6B MYR (≈$4.1B) | 89 | 76 | |
| 22 | 651.6B JPY (≈$4.4B) | 76 | 75 | |
| 23 | 797.3B JPY (≈$5.4B) | 76 | 52 | |
| 24 | 5.3B USD | 74 | 71 | |
| 25 | 34.8B HKD (≈$4.5B) | 72 | 75 | |
| 26 | 7.8B USD | 71 | 83 | |
| 27 | 31.5B CNY (≈$4.4B) | 70 | 75 | |
| 28 | 42.8B BRL (≈$7.7B) | 70 | 74 | |
| 29 | 56.3B HKD (≈$7.2B) | 70 | 71 | |
| 30 | 16.3B CAD (≈$11.9B) | 69 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score