Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ecovyst Inc.
How Ecovyst Inc. stacks up
ECVT · against 1,320 other Basic Materials companies
Valuation
55/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #589 of 1,321 · scores higher than 55% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score132 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including ECVT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 55?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Basic Materials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -5.6% vs peer median 3.6%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 64% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.3% vs peer median 8.5%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 71% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 6.6% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ECVT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ECVT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,281 reported | 2.3% | 3.8% | 39% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,352 reported | 11.3% | 8.6% | 64% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 409 reported | 6.6% | 2.6% | 71% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,275 reported | 53.4% | 61.0% | 43% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ECVT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 577.1B KRW (≈$416M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 219M MYR (≈$48M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 63M MYR (≈$14M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 1 | 1.39T ARS (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 224.2B CLP (≈$247M) | 100 | 47 | |
| 589 | 106.8B CNY (≈$15.0B) | 55 | 56 | |
| 589 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score