Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ECO · against 2,436 other Industrials companies
Ranked #1,883 of 2,437 · scores higher than 23% of peers · safety percentile 23
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)243 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including ECO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ECO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 2,360 reported | 0.82× | 0.41× | 29% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 2,360 reported | -0.06 | 0.61 | 97% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 2,374 reported | 4.43× | 1.62× | 93% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0B CNY (≈$280M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 2 | 79.5B JPY (≈$540M) | 100 | 79 | |
| 3 | 105.3B JPY (≈$716M) | 100 | 85 | |
| 4 | 38M MYR (≈$8M) | 100 | ||
| 4 | 157M USD | 100 | 35 | |
| 1,879 | 13.3B THB (≈$372M) | 23 | 44 | |
| 1,880 | 613M EUR (≈$674M) | 23 | 60 | |
| 1,881 | 13.5B CNY (≈$1.9B) | 23 | 13 | |
| 1,882 | 6.8B GBP (≈$8.8B) | 23 | 57 | |
| 1,883 | 3.6B USD | 23 | 51 | |
| 1,884 | 78.2B USD | 23 | 52 | |
| 1,885 | 15.8B EUR (≈$17.4B) | 23 | 50 | |
| 1,886 | 2.44T KRW (≈$1.8B) | 23 | 48 | |
| 1,887 | 30.7B SGD (≈$23.3B) | 23 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score