Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ECO · against 548 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #421 of 549 · scores higher than 23% of peers · safety percentile 23
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)73 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including ECO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ECO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 540 reported | 0.82× | 0.48× | 33% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 534 reported | -0.06 | 0.71 | 97% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 524 reported | 4.43× | 1.53× | 97% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.5B USD | 100 | 33 | |
| 2 | 5.7B USD | 99 | 36 | |
| 3 | 350.8B JPY (≈$2.4B) | 99 | 83 | |
| 4 | 28.9B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 5 | 2.45T CLP (≈$2.7B) | 99 | ||
| 417 | 2.9B USD | 23 | 35 | |
| 418 | 5.6B USD | 23 | 66 | |
| 419 | 6.2B CHF (≈$7.1B) | 23 | 50 | |
| 420 | 13.5B CNY (≈$1.9B) | 23 | 13 | |
| 421 | 3.6B USD | 23 | 51 | |
| 422 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 23 | 63 | |
| 423 | 30.3B BRL (≈$5.4B) | 22 | 66 | |
| 424 | 5.6B USD | 22 | 47 | |
| 425 | 5.4B EUR (≈$5.9B) | 22 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score