Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Everus Construction Group, Inc.
How Everus Construction Group, Inc. stacks up
ECG · against 437 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
48/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #263 of 438 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score61 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including ECG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.2% vs peer median 6.9%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.4% vs peer median 3.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.3% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ECG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ECG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 430 reported | 4.4% | 4.3% | 52% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 441 reported | 6.1% | 7.9% | 31% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 198 reported | 4.4% | 4.1% | 53% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 429 reported | 13.4% | 39.9% | 10% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ECG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 4 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2.8B EUR (≈$3.1B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 257 | 3.5B USD | 49 | 23 | |
| 263 | 25.3B HKD (≈$3.2B) | 48 | 65 | |
| 263 | 4.4B USD | 48 | 64 | |
| 263 | 319.2B INR (≈$3.8B) | 48 | 61 | |
| 263 | 5.8B USD | 48 | 72 | |
| 263 | 4.0B USD | 48 | 45 | |
| 263 | 7.2B USD | 48 | 70 | |
| 263 | 12.8B CAD (≈$9.4B) | 48 | 47 | |
| 263 | 4.9B CAD (≈$3.6B) | 48 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score