Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ECC · against 122 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #33 of 123 · scores higher than 74% of peers · safety percentile 78
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)17 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including ECC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its beta, current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ECC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 104 reported | 0.30× | 0.54× | 63% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 117 reported | 0.36 | 0.59 | 75% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 120 reported | 3.69× | 2.24× | 66% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 2 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 352.8B KRW (≈$254M) | 98 | ||
| 4 | 466M AUD (≈$308M) | 98 | ||
| 5 | 566M AUD (≈$374M) | 97 | 84 | |
| 29 | 1.8B HKD (≈$230M) | 80 | 32 | |
| 30 | 308M EUR (≈$338M) | 79 | 40 | |
| 31 | 370M USD | 79 | 85 | |
| 32 | 2.4B SEK (≈$242M) | 79 | ||
| 33 | 350M USD | 78 | ||
| 34 | 76.5B JPY (≈$520M) | 78 | 67 | |
| 35 | 2.7B CNY (≈$383M) | 78 | 23 | |
| 36 | 566M USD | 77 | 75 | |
| 37 | 659M USD | 77 | 72 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score