Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Brinker International, Inc.
How Brinker International, Inc. stacks up
EAT · against 201 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
50/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #102 of 202 · scores higher than 49% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score28 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including EAT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.2% vs peer median 8.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.4% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.6% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EAT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EAT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 199 reported | 5.1% | 4.9% | 53% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 205 reported | 8.2% | 8.7% | 44% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 112 reported | 6.4% | 6.3% | 52% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 199 reported | 5.1% | 32.7% | 7% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EAT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 5 | 6.99T KRW (≈$5.0B) | 95 | 78 | |
| 96 | 15.4B USD | 51 | 74 | |
| 96 | 13.9B USD | 51 | 44 | |
| 96 | 5.2B USD | 51 | 54 | |
| 102 | 16.7B USD | 50 | 54 | |
| 102 | 8.7B USD | 50 | 59 | |
| 104 | 9.8B USD | 49 | 57 | |
| 104 | 10.2B USD | 49 | 44 | |
| 104 | 181.9B ZAR (≈$10.0B) | 49 | 53 | |
| 107 | 4.6B USD | 48 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score